However, the reader quickly learns to take everything with a grain of salt and we are often dx coupon code november left wondering if he speaks the truth, or perhaps even a half-truth.
There is an article featuring this story and a good overview of Hamsuns biography here.
His unique style, voice, and his monumental simplistic prose have caused him to quickly become one of my favorites.
Niemand kende de pijn van zijn stille verdriet.Het publiek lachte luid maar voor hem was het uit.Vladimir Nabokov once wrote that one should not read books for the infantile purpose of identifying oneself with the characters but for the sake of their form, their visions, their art ( Lectures on Literature ).The closed mindedness, the destructiveness, the arrogance, and all the other hidden demons float to the surface around Nagel.If you can put his late life politics aside, you will find an incredible author whose name holds up to his comparisons.He makes up for it ten-fold.The nature of this novel is akin to the mysterious nature of the protagonist.While Nagel may be erratic and potentially manic, his boldness reveals an unapologetic image of himself, which brings out the truth in others.Due to this storytelling device, many critics have labeled Hamsun as one of the first early Modernists, and many authors followed in his footsteps.There is a wonderfully ironic moment when Martha Gude takes leave of Nagel to go see a preforming magician since the real magician of this novel is Nagel himself who preforms an elaborate smoke and mirrors trick of personality throughout the novel.
We follow the loquacious ravings, often liquor-fueled, of our hero, Johan Nilsen Nagel, from a calm steady conversation to the height of frenzy, and are shown glimpses through a cloudy window of the mind to his introspective obsessions.
Hij was maar een clown in t wit en in t rood.This story has no true linear plot, but sets Hamsuns colorful cast in one town and allows them to simply interact.He tells the town he is an agronomist, yet it is hinted that this is merely a ruse.To digress a mere moment, Hamsun was an outspoken critic of Ibsen, who was quite popular at the time.This is fully believable and creates for an intense, unpredictable character.Hunger and spitting a brutal assault on both.The biggest insights can only be hinted through a cryptic conversation between him and a former lover whom speak in elliptical allusions to the past and used words and phrases that had meaning only for them.